hier wird auch klar gestellt, dass bspw. die New York Times, die Dokumente zum zum iranischen Raketenprogramm mittles Auslassungen ins exakte Gegenteil verkehrt hat durch.
PORTER: Right. But the Iran angle is–you know, clearly the only reason for it was to push missile defense in Europe, so that a lot of people in this country who are arms manufacturers can make a lot of money, and so that the bureaucrats who are pushing the programs within the military and Defense Department could have done so
JAY: Now, you did some specific work on this issue, looking at some of the leaks that were not published in The New York Times on the question of Arab regime support for–.
PORTER: Right. And–.
JAY: What did you find?
PORTER: But let me just make–the larger point here is the second reason that the message about the real motives in US policy does not become clearer because of WikiLeaks is that where there is an exception here, and where the documents do shed light on it, The New York Times has the franchise on saying what they really mean, and they tell the world–the Washington Post follows them–saying, oh, yeah, this is showing that Iran really is a menace to Europe. And therefore it’s exactly the opposite message of what is in the documents.
JAY: Why? What did you find that’s the opposite?
PORTER: Well, in the case of this, of course, what I found was that the Russians, who really were very well informed about this issue of the phantom missile, said, no way. I mean, we’ve been following this for years. There’s no evidence whatsoever that this missile even exists, let alone that it’s been tested.
MCGOVERN: I saw its picture.
PORTER: Exactly. I mean–.
MCGOVERN: It’s a dummy.
PORTER: It’s a dummy. Yeah. So, anyway, I mean, the evidence was very powerful in this document. Had it been covered, you know, accurately, honestly by The New York Times, that message should have gotten out, but it didn’t.
wirklich sehr zu empfehlen!
überhaupt gehören the real news zu meinen absoluten favoriten. gerade höre ich mir noch eine Sendung zu wikileaks u. iran an, hab sie aber noch nicht durch.
ps. Einige Vertreterinnen der "Damen in weiss", zu der auch das eine "Opfer des geplatzten Kondoms" gehört, wurden aktuell übrigends von CDUlern zu einer Anti-Kuba-Veranstaltung nach Berlin eingeladen...
Anmerkung zum counterpunch artikel - obwohl die dort gemachten aussagen über Anna A. und ihre Anti-kuba/CIA Aktionen, auch von anderen seiten ebenso bestätigt wurden (hab das hier nochmal aufgelistet - http://gheimraetinsarchive.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/nochmal-assange-und-madam-a-from-kuba/) möchte ich dennoch drauf hinweisen, dass Israel Shamir aufgrund seiner antijüdischen tendenzen und querverbindunge zu rechtsextremen, nicht gerade eine lautere Quelle ist! sorry, hatte versäumt mich vor der verlinkung über ihn kundig zu machen, obwohl mir sein Name irgendwie vertraut war.
dennoch - er ist nicht die einzge Quelle, auch der Ex-CIA Anylyst im o. verlinkten video auf the real news bestätigte diese Kontakte u. verbindungen der Madam A. zu Posada Carrilles (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Posada_Carriles) ebenso wie die Kubanische Presse .
Wikileaks and the Diplomacy of Secrecy
Gareth Porter, Investigative Journalist and Ray McGovern, Retired CIA Analyst discuss Wikileaks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vlKD3KbnBZw
hier die originalseite incl. transcript
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=5968
hier wird auch klar gestellt, dass bspw. die New York Times, die Dokumente zum zum iranischen Raketenprogramm mittles Auslassungen ins exakte Gegenteil verkehrt hat durch.
PORTER: Right. But the Iran angle is–you know, clearly the only reason for it was to push missile defense in Europe, so that a lot of people in this country who are arms manufacturers can make a lot of money, and so that the bureaucrats who are pushing the programs within the military and Defense Department could have done so
JAY: Now, you did some specific work on this issue, looking at some of the leaks that were not published in The New York Times on the question of Arab regime support for–.
PORTER: Right. And–.
JAY: What did you find?
PORTER: But let me just make–the larger point here is the second reason that the message about the real motives in US policy does not become clearer because of WikiLeaks is that where there is an exception here, and where the documents do shed light on it, The New York Times has the franchise on saying what they really mean, and they tell the world–the Washington Post follows them–saying, oh, yeah, this is showing that Iran really is a menace to Europe. And therefore it’s exactly the opposite message of what is in the documents.
JAY: Why? What did you find that’s the opposite?
PORTER: Well, in the case of this, of course, what I found was that the Russians, who really were very well informed about this issue of the phantom missile, said, no way. I mean, we’ve been following this for years. There’s no evidence whatsoever that this missile even exists, let alone that it’s been tested.
MCGOVERN: I saw its picture.
PORTER: Exactly. I mean–.
MCGOVERN: It’s a dummy.
PORTER: It’s a dummy. Yeah. So, anyway, I mean, the evidence was very powerful in this document. Had it been covered, you know, accurately, honestly by The New York Times, that message should have gotten out, but it didn’t.
wirklich sehr zu empfehlen!
überhaupt gehören the real news zu meinen absoluten favoriten. gerade höre ich mir noch eine Sendung zu wikileaks u. iran an, hab sie aber noch nicht durch.
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=5989
greetz g.
ps. mehr zu den damen aus schweden, über die der CIA-analyst im ersten real-news link auch was zu sagen hat, hier
http://www.counterpunch.org/shamir09142010.html
ps. Einige Vertreterinnen der "Damen in weiss", zu der auch das eine "Opfer des geplatzten Kondoms" gehört, wurden aktuell übrigends von CDUlern zu einer Anti-Kuba-Veranstaltung nach Berlin eingeladen...
http://amerika21.de/nachrichten/2010/12/17831/kuba-systemgegner-tournee
dennoch - er ist nicht die einzge Quelle, auch der Ex-CIA Anylyst im o. verlinkten video auf the real news bestätigte diese Kontakte u. verbindungen der Madam A. zu Posada Carrilles (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Posada_Carriles) ebenso wie die Kubanische Presse .